http://inventblog.com/uspto/antacids-graham-crackers-the-supreme-court-decides-ksr-and-the-future-of-obviousness.html Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:53:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 http://inventblog.com/uspto/antacids-graham-crackers-the-supreme-court-decides-ksr-and-the-future-of-obviousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-1264 Lawrence B. Ebert Tue, 01 May 2007 13:10:15 +0000 http://inventblog.com/2007/04/antacids-graham-crackers-the-supreme-court-decides-ksr-and-the-future-of-obviousness.html#comment-1264 Of the text --In the case on appeal (KSR), the Supreme Court overruled the Federal Circuit’s non-obviousness finding--, the nonprecedential decision of the CAFC in the KSR sent the case back to the district court to provide a reason for motivation, relying on Kotzab. The CAFC did not rule on the obviousness of the invention. Of the text –In the case on appeal (KSR), the Supreme Court overruled the Federal Circuit’s non-obviousness finding–, the nonprecedential decision of the CAFC in the KSR sent the case back to the district court to provide a reason for motivation, relying on Kotzab. The CAFC did not rule on the obviousness of the invention.

]]> http://inventblog.com/uspto/antacids-graham-crackers-the-supreme-court-decides-ksr-and-the-future-of-obviousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-1263 La Cour suprême des États-Unis tente de redéfinir le test du critère de non-évidence « “C’est é-patent!” Tue, 01 May 2007 11:44:08 +0000 http://inventblog.com/2007/04/antacids-graham-crackers-the-supreme-court-decides-ksr-and-the-future-of-obviousness.html#comment-1263 [...] more expensive than ever) to prosecute and obtain patents and easier to invalidate them.”) -Commentaire de InventBlog -Commentaire de Patent [...] [...] more expensive than ever) to prosecute and obtain patents and easier to invalidate them.”) -Commentaire de InventBlog -Commentaire de Patent [...]

]]>