<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Riddence&#8230;Document Disclosure Program Ending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventblog.com/2006/11/good_riddencedo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventblog.com/uspto/good_riddencedo.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:09:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Norton Townsley</title>
		<link>http://inventblog.com/uspto/good_riddencedo.html/comment-page-1#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Norton Townsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventblog.com/?p=945#comment-597</guid>
		<description>The other problem with the Document Disclosure program was that the document had to be written as well as a patent.  I tried to assert one that had been written by a client one time.  The Office examined it very carefully and determined that it did not contain enough information to support our contention that the invention had been invented as early as claimed in the document.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other problem with the Document Disclosure program was that the document had to be written as well as a patent.  I tried to assert one that had been written by a client one time.  The Office examined it very carefully and determined that it did not contain enough information to support our contention that the invention had been invented as early as claimed in the document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
