Private PAIR improvements

February 16, 2006 on 2:28 pm | In Patent Searching, USPTO |

Via an email I just received…

The United States Patent & Trademark Office invites you to participate in a special web announcement event on Thursday, February 23rd at 2 p.m. Eastern to discuss important new enhancements to Private PAIR.

To participate in this event, which will be conducted via web-cast, you must first register by clicking on the following link:

http://webex.client.ninesystems.com/uspto

During this one-hour event, USPTO’s e-Commerce Program Manager William Stryjewski will review important enhancements to Private PAIR including:

• Changes to Private PAIR access
• Availability of additional Content
• First Action Prediction
• Security changes

Remember, this web announcement will be held Thursday, February 23rd at 2 p.m. Eastern/11 a.m. Pacific and requires registration. Don’t miss this important opportunity to learn more about the changes to PAIR conducted by USPTO’s eCommerce Program Manager, Mr. William Stryjewski.

Click here to assure your placement on the invitation list for this web event.

http://webex.client.ninesystems.com/uspto

United States Patent & Trademark Office
Search and Information Resources
600 Dulany St.
Alexandria, VA

UPDATE/EDIT:  someone pointed out that the URL contained my personal information…nice.  I’ve killed the link for now.  If someone finds a real URL, please post a comment.  Thanks.  SMN

Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post | | Subscribe via e-mail

Related Posts:

4 Comments

  1. Maybe, you’re wondering how come I landed on your blog. If so, you might want to apportion some of the blame to Evan Schaeffer’s http://www.legalunderground.com, which by the bye has a rather neat blogroll.

    Anyway, upon visiting your little nook in the vast galaxy of the Internet, I surmised you’d welcome some insight concerning President William Jefferson Clinton.

    I, for one, can be easily persuaded that President Clinton introduced … ah, maybe not in so many words … “evolutionary economics”. Acting within the constraints, imposed by this new economic discipline, the man made possible the hope that the nation’s national debt could be discharged.

    For more details, regarding this insight of mine, one needs only click on the hyperlink below:

    http://hewhoisknownassefton.bl.....onary.html

    toodles
    ……/
    .he who is known as sefton

    darn ol’paranoid me … before depositing a comment here on your blog, I sent an e.mail to some 63 law school professors about the article, found at the other end of the above hyperlink.

    Comment by he who is known as sefton — February 16, 2006 #

  2. I don’t know what the point of Private Pair is if the examiners don’t even bother using it-over the years a few have told us as much. We recently had a case that went abandoned even though a response was filed in a timely manner AND was POSTED on the Pair system-and, the extension of time fee has been debited from our account! The examiner claimed he couldn’t find the current phone number for our firm even though it was changed 4 months ago and is associated with customer number, etc. This really TICKS me off, to say the least.

    The PTO is one messed up organization that seems to be a bureaucratic disaster.

    Comment by Anthony — February 17, 2006 #

  3. Events for Corporate Counsel: Week of February 20-24, 2006

    This week’s events for corporate counsel include: The ABA’s Section on Antitrust Law will host a teleconference, Agency HSR Data Requests, on Tuesday, February 21, beginning at 12:00 pm eastern. fios is hosting a webcast, Can we Talk? Improving Communi…

    Trackback by CompanyCounselor — February 20, 2006 #

  4. I recently had a case in which I made an amendment,in which I failed to place a page return between the first page andthe claims page. Althugh the amendment was filed withinthe first monthhe failed to notify by phone and waited three months to notify by mail that the amendment had not been entered due to improper proceedure. I corrected the amendment and returned it the next day. The PTO then dicovered that one of the claims only had its status shown as “amended” and not “currently amended”.they again refused to enter the amendment and failed to notify me for another four months at which time they abandoned the application for failure to respond within the alloted time period. I had to file a petition to revive for a simple formality. It seems that the PTO is no longer a customer orented operation.

    Comment by Bob — February 24, 2006 #

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^