Dynacore Holdings Corp., et al. v. U.S. Philips Corp., et al.

March 31, 2004 on 10:51 pm | In Caselaw |

DYNACORE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and DYNACORE PATENT LITIGATION TRUST, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION, and STMICROELECTRONICS, INC., and MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, and JVC AMERICAS CORP., and COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION, GATEWAY, INC., HEWLETT-PACKARD CORPORATION, and SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., and EPSON AMERICA, INC., and FUJITSU PC CORPORATION, FUJITSU MICROELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
and FUJITSU COMPUTER PRODUCTS OF AMERICA, INC., and TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, and WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, and DELL COMPUTER CORPORATION and DELL MARKETING CORPORATION, and APPLE COMPUTER, INC., and NEC COMPUTERS INC., and NIKON INC., and ADAPTEC, INC., and SMARTDISK CORPORATION, and ADS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees, and EVERGREEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and QUADMATION INCORPORATED, Defendants.
Federal Circuit, March 31, 2004.
“Dynacore Holdings Corp. and Dynacore Patent Litigation Trust (collectively, “Dynacore”) appeal the February 13, 2003 grant of defendants’ motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of United States Patent No. 5,077,732 (“the ‘732 Patent”)….Because Dynacore has not identified any circumstances under which the accused products, which incorporate technology that facilitates the design of networks compliant with an explicitly hierarchical industry-standard architecture, infringe the parallel network architecture required to meet numerous limitations of the ‘732 Patent claims, the defendants may not be held liable for either direct or indirect infringement. We therefore affirm.”
Copy of the case here.

 Print This Post |  Email This Post | | Subscribe via e-mail

Related Posts:

• Unova, Inc. v. Acer Inc., et al. (Fed.Cir.)
• Scanner Technologies Corporation v. Icos Vision Systems Corporation, N.V.
• Federal Circuit Update (Sept. 30 - Oct 5)