Ruiz, et al. v. A.B. Chance Company
Federal Circuit
Decided January 29, 2004
Holding: “…this court holds that the district court did not clearly err in finding a motivation to combine the prior art references in the nature of the problem at issue. In addition, this court holds that the district court did not clearly err in discounting Chance’s evidence of secondary considerations. Accordingly, this court affirms the judgment of the district court.”

Additional summary probably found here (Intellectual Property Owners Association web site) within a week of the decision. Click here for a copy of this Federal Circuit court opinion.

Related posts:

1. Nomos Corp. v. Brainlab USA, Inc., et al. (Fed. Cir.)
2. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al. v. Pharmachemie B.V. (Fed. Cir.)