National Steel Car, LTD. v. Canadian Pacific Railway, LTD, et al. (Fed. Cir.)

January 29, 2004 on 4:32 pm | In Caselaw |

National Steel Car, LTD. v. Canadian Pacific Railway, LTD, et al.
Federal Circuit
Decided: January 29, 2004
Holding: “In conclusion, we hold that the district court abused its discretion in determining that NSC had demonstrated that CPR’s defenses lacked substantial merit and in granting the preliminary injunction. Based on the record before us, both CPR’s section 272 argument and its argument concerning the invalidity of the ‘575 patent on the basis of obviousness raise defenses with substantial merit.”
The court thus reversed the district court’s preliminary injunction.
Copy of case here (self extracting MS Word document).

Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post | | Subscribe via e-mail

Related Posts:

No Comments yet

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^